‘The digital dawn will lead us to question how, when and why we administer school exams’

We are told that the days of pen-and-paper exams are numbered, but that number seems to be a constant: it’ll be 10 years before high-stakes public exams are routinely digital. Next year, no doubt, it’ll still be 10 years. Faith in the necessary transformation amounts to millenarianism. So, to fill time while we await the rapture, let’s consider the implications of ditching treeware for technology. Tes reports.

Merely going paperless is beside the point. Once tests are digitised, interesting things become possible, in principle. Tests no longer need to be fixed in time (cue on-demand testing), nor do they need to be linear, nor one-size-fits-all (enter adaptive and multistage testing).

On-demand testing is a reality in medical and military aptitude assessment and some HE admissions in the US. It seems appropriate for any situation in which baseline mastery or threshold competence is required. Personalised learning would seem to fit well with the concept of entering a candidate when s/he is considered ready, rather than waiting for the official window – which could be months away.

Of course, there are wrinkles. A huge bank of questions is needed, and they all need to be pretested. Candidates might find it difficult to allocate their time appropriately if they don’t know how difficult subsequent questions are going to be. These sorts of tests are most appropriate for multiple-choice items, or those which, like US SATs, require analogies, fill-in-the-blanks and synonyms.

Multistage testing is another algorithm-based approach in which tests can be built in stages. Groups of items can be presented in a sequence appropriate to the ability of the candidate. This is surely a smarter approach than tiering.

But is any of this remotely relevant to high-stakes public exams such as GCSEs? Arguably, yes, if it leads us to rethink the purpose of GCSE. On-demand, adaptive testing has advantages over fixed-length, linear, pen-and-paper formats when it comes to high-stakes summative exams. What precisely do we want to know from GCSE, given that it is no longer the terminal qualification? It should tell us whether a student has reached a critical threshold of proficiency or mastery. As a summative test, GCSE exists for the purposes of demonstration rather than development.

We should not look to technology simply as a way of administering our current arrangements more efficiently. We should use the opportunity to transform not just how and when we assess, but more fundamentally, why.

Read more ‘The digital dawn will lead us to question how, when and why we administer school exams’

Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!


Fast food outlets should be banned from opening near schools to tackle obesity epidemic, say doctors
Robots interviewing graduates for jobs at top city firms as students practice how to impress AI
Categories: Exams, Secondary and Technology.

Let us know what you think...