Teachers are miserable because they’re being held at gunpoint for meaningless data

Everyone seems to be dancing around the elephant in the room. Jeremy Corbyn is talking about scrapping Sats. The DfE is on the workload warpath. Ofsted is myth-busting itself out of the dark ages into the 21st century, saying it doesn’t care about marking any more. Almost a third of teachers quit in the first five years, and those who stay are burning out in record numbers. A headteacher from London writes in The Guardian.

Let me clear up this edu-mess for you. It’s not Sats. It’s not workload. The elephant in the room is high-stakes accountability. Our education system actively promotes holding schools, leaders and teachers at gunpoint for a very narrow set of test outcomes. This has long been proven to be one of the worst ways to bring about sustainable change. It is time to change this educational paradigm before we have no one left in the classroom except the children.

Accountability. Surely that’s a good thing? I don’t think there is an educator in the country who would disagree with the idea that schools have a responsibility to be their very best. But we have options about how we make it happen.

Gunpoint is one option. We tell schools, leaders and teachers to make something happen or they will be miserable, jobless or a combination of both. This can lead to some pretty quick change, but it’s not long-lasting and will bring only compliance to the minimum standards because being held at gunpoint is stifling. It creates a “take-no-risks” attitude that becomes enshrined in the culture of leadership within a school. School improvement is seen as school inspection. Gains are made by the act of weighing. When gains are not made, the problem lies within the school, leader or teacher, rather than the culture, climate or conditions. But this isn’t the only option. There is another way.

In such systems – and they do exist in some countries, such as Finland and Canada, and even in some brave schools in this country – development isn’t centred on inspection, but rather professional collaboration. These schools don’t perform regular observations and monitoring, or fire out over-prescriptive performance policies. Instead, they discuss and design pedagogy, engage in action research, and regularly perform activities such as learning and lesson study. Everyone understands that growing great educators involves moments of brilliance and moments of mayhem.

These systems don’t overburden schools with prescription and policy. There are no guns pointed at anyone. When a school is struggling, the entire system rallies around it with finance, resource and expertise.

And yet, in England, this type of thinking is distinctly unconventional. It takes courage and conviction. A rogue leader. It requires us to rethink what we’ve always been told is true, necessary and valuable.

Read the full article Teachers are miserable because they’re being held at gunpoint for meaningless data

Could professional collaboration work in your school? Who’s going to turn this ‘high-stakes accountability’ elephant around? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter~ Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!




Draft school curriculum for Wales published - "big culture change"
School exclusions for drugs and alcohol at ten-year high as 'county lines' gangs are blamed
Categories: 1st POST, Data, Employment, Exams, Infant, Leadership, Primary, Secondary and Teaching.


  1. “This has long been proven to be one of the worst ways to bring about sustainable change. ” This may be correct, but please point to the evidence which shows this.

Let us know what you think...