Shortfall in free nursery place scheme, figures show

According to a report from the BBC, just seven out of 10 of the most disadvantaged two-year-olds earmarked for free childcare on a flagship scheme have been offered a place…

Ministers pledged 15 hours a week of free childcare to 130,000 two-year-olds in England from September.

But the latest Department for Education figures show that just 92,000 children are receiving such childcare.

Childcare providers said the offer, which was heralded by the deputy prime minister, was not properly funded.

Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Pre-School Learning Alliance, said at a time when many providers were still underfunded for the existing free nursery place scheme for all three- and four-year-olds, it was vital that the government makes sure the two-year-old scheme is adequately funded.

“This will determine the success of the initiative and the positive impact for generations to come.”

Some nursery providers say the average rate of funding, £5.12 per hour, is so low the work they would have to carry out with these disadvantaged children would effectively be “pro bono”. This is because of the very high level of need that the children have because they are younger and sometimes highly troubled.

The scheme has struggled to find enough free childcare places for disadvantaged two-year-olds, often because nursery provision tends to be in more affluent areas where the disadvantaged children being targeted do not live. Also places have to be in settings rated good or outstanding by Ofsted…

Mr Clegg praised the number of places made available on the scheme, saying: “Early access to high-quality childcare is vitally important to ensure children are ready for school, ready for the world and able to get a good start in life.

“Giving disadvantaged children early support gives them the best possible chance to succeed, it means they’re less likely to fall behind their wealthier classmates and it can make a huge impact on their future. It is vital for a fair and prosperous society.”

However, the Department for Education has now said the funding for the places will in future be on a “use it or lose it basis”.

“The number of participating children will determine the amount of funding they get,” it said.

“Where parents are not taking up these place, local authorities will get less money.”

The department is due to expand the scheme to 260,000 children in England next September.

Childcare workers association Pacey, which represents many childminders, said it was concerned that the government had already noted that in some areas it might not have enough providers rated good or outstanding to cover all the children entitled to the two-year-old offer, and would have to use providers graded as requiring improvement.

Its chief executive, Liz Bayram, said: “This is of even more concern given the emerging evidence that individual childminders are struggling to access funding through this scheme, as local authorities seem to show a preference for nursery settings to deliver this care, even if those settings might not be good or outstanding.

“Many families benefit from the flexible home-based service that childminders offer, so ensuring parents can make a real choice about the type of childcare that is right for them could only help increase uptake even further.”

More at:  Shortfall in free nursery place scheme, figures show

How are you seeing this scheme work out on the ground where you are? Are the funding levels too low to provide the kind of care needed in the most deprived areas as suggested? Please share your thoughts and observations in the comments or on twitter… 

Today's poll: Should a parent ever be sent to prison for failing to send a child to school?
Dozens of schools failing to enter pupils for GCSE history (but numbers down sharply from previous year)
Categories: Pre-school.


  1. PrincesBold

    andylutwyche SchoolsImprove Actually shows how little is paid to providers, hardly worth doing, not financially viable!

Let us know what you think...