Schools and the new parent power: this time, the fight is personal

The Guardian is reporting that parent groups have been launching around the country to take on cuts, Sats, holidays, academisation and the curriculum, declaring ‘we won’t be pushed aside’.

There have been campaigns against academies since the policy of freeing schools from local authority control was launched by New Labour, and the Anti-Academies Alliance has been around for 10 years. But the government’s latest push, signalled by its schools white paper in March – combined with evidence of poor performance at some multi-academy trusts and publicity surrounding high salaries and financial irregularities – has led to a renewed surge of activism.

David James, professor at Cardiff University and editor of the British Journal of Sociology of Education, thinks parents were slow to realise the implications of a policy that took schools out of local control. “It changes the whole dynamic,” he says. “It happened slowly but inexorably, and people partly didn’t realise because New Labour were as responsible as anyone else.”

But more recent moves to reshape governing bodies along corporate lines and reduce the number of parent governors, or remove them altogether, seem to have woken fears among parents that their voices may in future be ignored. “There is an assumption that if you’re an accountant or a lawyer you have a better sense of what is needed,” says Natasha Steel, parent. “In my opinion the lollipop lady and playground assistant know more about the children in a school than anybody else, but they are to be excluded because they can’t manage data.”

Asked whether the weight given to parents’ opinions by Ofsted has changed, a spokesperson for the regulator highlighted Parent View, the online questionnaire launched in 2011, while a statement from the Department for Education said: “we want parents to be more involved in their child’s education, not less”, and that the “expectation that academies listen to the views and needs of parents” will be strengthened.

But despite evidence from the outgoing chief inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, and others that many multi-academy trusts are underperforming, and the reasonable inference that their governance model is not better than the local authority one, the government seems determined to press ahead with reforms that value skills over stakeholders.

More at: Schools and the new parent power: this time, the fight is personal

Do you think that parents should have a greater say in the governance of their child’s school? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below or on Twitter. ~ Nellie

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!


Armed forces to access student loans from abroad after change in rules
Rise in trans children puts British schools to the test
Categories: Academies, Parenting and Policy.


  1. gov2

    There does however remain an enormous amount of ignorance about what academisation actually means.  Not least amongst staff and governors of academies and MATs, plus of course these ridiculous ‘National Leaders of Governance’ i.e. the credulous toadies who just assume that Government propaganda must be true.

  2. Cordy59

    SchoolsImprove I’d add #schoollibrarians 2 that list. We’re often a refuge 4 vulnerable students or r included in revelatory conversations.

  3. Deception about academies started as soon as Labour opened the first few.  That’s why Labour couldn’t effectively oppose Gove’s academization programme.  Most of the media churned the DfE’s propaganda: those who opposed academization, however well-reasoned their arguments, were dismissed by Gove as ‘Marxists’, ‘Enemies of promise’ promoting a ‘bigoted, backward’ ideology.  But parents and the public were being deceived.  The signs were there before 2010 that academization alone wasn’t a magic bullet.

    And still the DfE persists that academization is the best way to improve the education system in England despite years of evidence to the contrary.

Let us know what you think...