Schools need to up their game to attract the best governors

Professor Chris James from the University of Bath researches school governing and says schools in challenging circumstances need good governors the most, but often put the least amount of effort into recruiting them, thereby helping create a vicious cycle. This is from the Conversation..

If a school has a good governing body it has a better chance of being a good school. But any governing body will only be as good as its individual members, which puts a real premium on the recruitment of governors. Schools need to reach out to persuade local people as well as staff and parents to come forward and seek election to the governing body. But the recruitment of governors continues to be a challenge, especially for those governing bodies most in need of new faces – those in charge of struggling schools.

Research into school governing, which we carried out between 2008 and 2010, showed that schools varied in the number of willing and able potential governors who lived nearby. We called this pool of potential governors “governance capital”. The term of office is four years so recruiting governors is a continual challenge.

This governance capital was higher in schools in relatively advantaged and well-off areas, where pupils achieved well and got good exam results – and which were already well-regarded by their local communities or Ofsted.

Lack of suitable candidates

Five years later, we did another survey of school governors in England in the spring of 2014. Of the 7,000 governors who answered our survey, 66% said that recruiting governors was difficult.

The recent survey results showed that the problem continues to be more pronounced in schools serving disadvantaged areas, where 83% said it was difficult to recruit school governors, compared to schools in relatively advantaged areas, where 62% had trouble recruiting. It was also much harder to recruit at schools with below average levels of pupil attainment than in schools where children were doing above the average. And schools with an Ofsted grade of “requires improvement” or “satisfactory” found it harder to find governors than those with an “outstanding” Ofsted grade.

Where you need governors most, the pool of potential governors is smallest. But the governing bodies of schools that need governors the most appear to put less energy into recruitment. For example, 42% of governors at schools with a poor Ofsted grade said they put “in a lot of effort” to governor recruitment, compared to 51% of the top-rated schools.

We also asked if the difficulties in recruiting governors had any effect on the quality of their governing bodies. Overall, 37% of respondents reported that their governing body would be more effective if they could recruit more people of higher quality. This was higher in disadvantaged and struggling schools, supporting the idea that recruitment difficulties have a negative effect on the quality of school governing.

Here we see the genesis of a vicious cycle. Struggling schools that need good governors have fewer governors available to them and so their quality drops. One of the effects is that these governing bodies put less effort into recruitment, weakening the governing body even further and making it less able to ensure that the schools’ conduct is appropriate. So the school struggles even more and its “governance capital” is reduced further. The vicious cycle is perpetuated.

Raising governors’ profile

There are a number of ways to break the cycle. At the moment, school governing is currently too hidden from view – it needs to be more visible in society. Governors’ responsibility for the conduct of schools need to be more widely acknowledged – by parents, teachers, headteachers, the school’s wider community and even Ofsted and the Department for Education.

When governors and governing bodies make an excellent contribution, it should be acknowledged. For example, when an academy is given an outstanding Ofsted grade, the secretary of state should write to the governors to thank them.

The importance of governing bodies should be acknowledged by the establishment of a national database – starting with a database of chairs. At the moment, the Department of Education does not know – and has never known – who chairs each school or academy governing body. This means it doesn’t know who is responsible for proper conduct of governing bodies that are in turn responsible for the conduct of the nation’s schools. This is a quite astonishing state of affairs.

Local “non-education” organisations such as businesses need to be ready to support the involvement of their employees in school governing – not just as a contribution to society but because of the learning and development opportunities it brings.

And governor recruitment organisations such as SGOSS and the Inspiring Governors Initiative, which is a charity, need more support for the excellent work they do.

If implemented, these ideas may go some way to breaking the vicious cycle of governor recruitment and governing quality in struggling schools…

More at: Schools need to up their game to attract the best governors

 

These sound like some good ideas for helping schools break the cycle of weak governance – is there anything you would add or challenge? What one practical step do you think would make the most difference? Please let us know in the comments or via Twitter…

 

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin every morning (around 7 am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link!

The Conversation

School Direct 'simply does not work', says Institute of Education director
Teaching assistant denies 'bullying' girl, 7, for own amusement
Categories: Policy.

Comments

  1. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove Nothing to disagree with other than to remember that being a governor is voluntary; therein lies the recruitment issue

  2. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove Schools in SM or RI will require more voluntary work than those in G or OS schools, at least that will be the perception

  3. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove Weight of responsibility on governors in modern education is huge for a voluntary role, which will also be an issue for many

  4. Bedtonman

    andylutwyche SchoolsImprove I find asking people face to face works really well! People don’t think about doing it

  5. jess_madge

    andylutwyche SchoolsImprove Loved the notion that a congratulatory letter from sec of state would motivate governors. LOL.

  6. 5N_Afzal

    It would! Schools that get a notice to improve have the name of the Chair made public as the letter is addressed to the Chair in many cases. Schools that get OS judgements receive congratulatory letters addressed to the Head not the Chair.

  7. neilayates

    SchoolsImprove Schools won’t attract governors in large numbers while the commitment needed increases & responsibility becomes more onerous

  8. neilayates

    SchoolsImprove Schools won’t attract governors in large numbers while the commitment needed increases & responsibility becomes more onerous

  9. neilayates

    SchoolsImprove Schools won’t attract governors in large numbers while the commitment needed increases & responsibility becomes more onerous

  10. andylutwyche

    jess_madge SchoolsImprove As a staff governor a letter from NickyMorgan01 regarding an Ofsted judgement would be meaningless

  11. jess_madge

    andylutwyche SchoolsImprove When got Good despite goalpost moving by secs of state. I was grinning ear to ear for several days.

  12. mm684

    SchoolsImprove StaffsGA my MA thesis looked at this. In the nearly 200 reports I examined no grade 1 school had less than grade 1 GB.

Let us know what you think...