School pupils are being challenged to debate trans and gender issues – and whether unisex toilets are a good thing

School toilets have never had the best of reputations. What with bullying, smoking and lobbing balls of wet tissue on to the ceiling, pupils have traditionally headed there for mischief. iNews reports.

For teenagers with gender dysphoria, school toilets, with their stark boy/girl divide, pose an additional trauma. But what if schools were to install gender-neutral bathrooms instead?

That is the question being put to thousands of children at secondary schools across the UK as part of a Royal Institution-backed initiative to get children thinking differently about science.

Hundreds of schools are expected to download the RI’s debate kits, which give pupils different roles to play, from concerned father to transgender teenager, to reflect a wide range of perspectives on what is a sensitive topic.

Meanwhile some medics have raised concerns this week about how children are being treated by the NHS’s Gender Identity Development Service, and the Royal College of Psychiatrists is drawing up new guidelines on how to deal with trans cases among young people.

Dom McDonald, the RI’s head of education, admits the organisation was braced to “cop a bit of flak” for encouraging schools to tackle the issue of gender and sexuality.

“We tried quite hard to avoid this topic,” he says. “But the more we thought about it, the more we thought this topic crystallised many questions around identity and genetics; nature versus nurture; and social, ethical and moral considerations.”

The RI launched its debate kits in 2017 as a way to consolidate the theme of its high-profile Christmas lectures, which are broadcast on BBC Four. In December, Professor Alice Roberts tackled the question of who are we, with help from geneticist Aoife McLysaght.

At Francis Holland, an all-girls’ school in west London, the bathrooms may remain single sex, but that didn’t stop a group of Year 11 pupils from tackling the issue at a recent lunchtime debate. The discussion ranged from dissecting the very meaning of gender to considering whether toilets should remain “safe spaces” for those who are born biologically female.

Allie Rinck, one of the school’s science teachers, says the kit helped to “contextualise the science within a societal issue that is interesting and engaging to teenagers”.

Facts gleaned during the debate ranged from complex science, such as how chromosomes not matching up correctly during meiosis can lead to an embryo with the sex chromosomes XXY or XYY, to how adults treated newborn babies differently depending whether they wore pink or blue clothing.

Read more School pupils are being challenged to debate trans and gender issues – and whether unisex toilets are a good thing

Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter – Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!


Edukit Safeguarding Insight

Career civil servants could head academies system
Ofsted uncovers 500 suspected illegal schools in England
Categories: Learning, Mental Health, Secondary and Teaching.


  1. Mari

    There’s no need to debate these faddish ideologies. Just provide male, female and unisex facilities for students and ensure that transgender people use the unisex ones. If it’s just about going to the bathroom there should be no issue with this. It seems to me this is more about indoctrination than education, particularly indoctrinating female students to disregard their own personal boundaries and hard won rights. Hardly conducive to gender equality and the safeguarding of children and young people.

  2. VS

    This is a consultation and its a paper exercise. When they say “an initiative to get children thinking differently about science” – do they mean to disregard it in favour of religion?

    Theyre rolling this out in schools for a reason. If they asked the over 30 demographic it wdnt work. Theyll use teenage girls as their test case and then spread it to the public .

    Women are not being given a choice. Lets have a referendum on this. And ill bet you women for womens spaces vote Remain

Let us know what you think...