Questions over PR firm’s dual role in academy takeover

Writing in his Guardian column, Warwick Mansell asks if a company that oversaw the consultation on a controversial sponsored academy conversion should also have been advising the would-be sponsor on public relations.

The question arises after correspondence was released, through a freedom of information request, between senior figures at the Inspiration Trust academy chain and the man who handled interactions with parents before the trust’s takeover of the Hewett school in Norwich.

Consultant Jonathan Haslam was appointed, through his company HaslamDodd, to collect and report on survey responses and preside over public meetings during the consultation this summer. Most respondents rejected Inspiration, but the Department for Education still allowed the chain to take over the Hewett last month.

Before the consultation, in May, the interim board then running the school told parents HaslamDodd had been appointed to “ensure the consultation process is impartial”. There is no suggestion that Haslam failed to record consultation responses accurately.

However, in an email on 20 April to Inspiration’s chief executive, Dame Rachel de Souza, Haslam said he and his consulting partner, Sheree Dodd, “believe the consultation should be an opportunity for IT [Inspiration Trust] … to share and celebrate success, extend the range of supporters and ambassadors and open up/diversify its profile”.

In an email two days later to Sir Theodore Agnew, Inspiration’s chair, Haslam set out a series of apparent public relations “key messages” for the trust…

Campaigner Lynsey White, who received the Freedom of Information response, said: “The emails show that HaslamDodd were pushing the Inspiration Trust’s agenda. That’s not what we were told during the consultation.”

Haslam denies any conflict of interest…

More (including an update on asbestos in schools) at: Questions over PR firm’s dual role in academy takeover

 

There is no suggestion Jonathan Haslam failed to record the responses correctly and he points to the 95 page consultation report as evidence of this, but does it seem entirely appropriate for one man/company to be tasked with ensuring the consolation is impartial and then advising one side on their PR messaging?

Incidentally, Warwick Mansell goes on to note that parents who objected to the takeover are likely to be further upset on learning that the new chair of governors has been named as Dame Rachel de Souza.

Your thoughts on all this? Please share in the comments or via Twitter…

 

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin every morning (around 7 am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link

Supersize schools: how big is too big … 2,000? Or 4,000?
Lack of classroom support for gay pupils in Scotland slammed
Categories: Academies and Parenting.

Comments

  1. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove The name “Dame Rachel De Souza” crops up in a controversial academy news story. One begins to smell a rat after a while

  2. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove The name “Dame Rachel De Souza” crops up in controversial academy news story again. One begins to smell a rat after a while

  3. It’s hardly surprising parents would be annoyed to find Dame Rachel is Chair of Hewett Governors.  She was the one who emailed Sir Theodore Agnew saying the Good Ofsted judgement on Hewett had made her feel ‘sick’.  This doesn’t suggest she had the best interests of Hewett’s pupils in mind at the time.

  4. Mansell’s article also mentions the notorious DfE embargoed press release of last week which accused parents and others who opposed enforced academy conversion of their school as being intimidating mobs.  The press release was toned down when it was released publicly.
    One of the three case studies in both the embargoed and revised press release was the Hewett school.  It said Hewett had been in special measures twice in ten years but didn’t mention the three Satisfactory and one Good judgement between the first Inadequate judgement and the last one.  The last Inadequate judgement reversed Ofsted monitoring finding that the school was improving.
    This mirrors the situation at the two other case study schools: two primaries, Downhills and Roke, which were handed to Harris.  Such rapid reversals bring Ofsted into disrepute.
    http://www.localschoolsnetwork.org.uk/2015/10/dfe-justifies-proposal-banning-opposition-to-academy-conversion-by-accusing-protesters-of-being-rabid-mobs/

  5. amirshah316

    SchoolsImprove this is precisely the kind of conflict of interest that would make an MP resign. It shouldn’t happen in any public sector!

Let us know what you think...