As protesters descend on London, it’s high time the teaching unions stopped scaremongering over school funding

The Telegraph reports that credit where credit is due: the National Union of Teachers and other unions played an absolute blinder with their extremely successful School Cuts campaign earlier this year. It feels like only yesterday that the government announced that it had found an additional £1.3 billion funding for England’s schools as a result of it.

However, like a group that stumbled upon a No. 1 hit single, the unions are back today, and their comeback song doesn’t sound very different to their last: give us more cash or schools will crumble, teachers will leave in droves, and our children’s future will be as bleak as a Ken Loach film.

With a tune like this, no wonder we’re struggling to recruit more teachers – when was the last time you heard a union say anything positive about the profession?

I don’t blame them for trying it on – getting more cash for their members is why they exist. However, as someone who has been in education for 15 years, including five years as a headmaster, I think that they are just plain wrong with their scaremongering. I worry that the relentless doom and gloom will backfire when their premonitions fail to come to pass, and could undermine important developments on other aspects of funding.

Actually, I think that the year-on-year growth in funding experienced by the school system since 1997 is part of the reason why the recent slowdown feels so painful. Between 1997 and 2015, per pupil primary funding went up by 114 percent; the equivalent for secondary was 90 percent. The additional cash went on more staff, higher salaries, and ever-increasing pension contributions too. Financially, we had never had it so good.

More importantly though, we’re within reach of a massive prize for education: a proper “National Funding Formula” (NFF). This would mean that – finally – a student in Bedford will get the same money as those living in Bradford or Brixham.

The unions are really missing a trick here. If we can achieve agreement on NFF, it completely changes the conversation. Political parties will stop playing games and compete with one another to boost the money each individual kid gets. I predict a significant increase in this as a result. 

However, if people push too hard, too soon, for more cash, the whole consensus around this could collapse, and a once in a generation opportunity to make funding fairer will be lost.

Read the full article As protesters descend on London, it’s high time the teaching unions stopped scaremongering over school funding

Do you agree with Mark Lehain? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link 

We now have a Facebook page - pls click to like!

 

More recent posts...

 

Justine Greening reveals locations chosen for student loan reimbursement pilots
‘Scrooge of schools’ Jamie Oliver blasted for wanting to ban bake sales
Categories: Budgets, Employment, Free Schools, Infant, Primary, and Secondary.

Comments

  1. Susan

    I could comment on the credibility of the article- it is the Telegraph, known for emotive, manipulative ‘articles.’ I could comment on the author’s obsession with teacher pay and how we are so much better off (considering that teachers are the lowest paid profession and no doctor or lawyer would work for our wages I think the comments about wages are meant to appeal to those who already think we have it ‘good.’ I could comment on how I spend my Salary buying equipment for my classroom, how my school does not have money to put up emergency exit signs in part of the schools or not being able to afford staff but considering the antagonistic, stereotypical nature of this article you are promoting I doubt you would be interested. So I’ll close with this: recruitment crisis, students being taught by unqualified teachers, a government that has already justified not having subject specialists. Tell me again that the fight is meaningless?

  2. Anonymous

    ‘ … students being taught by unqualified teachers, a government that has already justified not having subject specialists …’

    Also remember the article is written by a free school enthusiast for whom features such as these are a benefit.

  3. He obviously knows nothing about the NFF. It doesn’t really seem to be the change that people have been wanting for years, just a tiny rearrangement that is unlikely to do the job as advertised. It will not mean that everyone everywhere will get the same funding. And that’s the government’s second go at it! The first version would have made everything worse, sometime much worse, for almost everyone including those who are already unfairly treated by the existing system and for whose benefit the change was wanted. There will be no reaching agreement about it; the government will be seeking to impose its latest version and that will likely be it.

Let us know what you think...