This Thursday an indignant parent, James Coombs, will stand in front of a tribunal to argue that the controversial 11-plus test needs greater scrutiny and that families should be shown their children’s raw scores. Why shouldn’t this important test, which changes the course of children’s lives, be open to evaluation like GCSEs and other life‑changing exams, he asks. The Guardian reports.
“It’s an existential problem to the grammar system. If you demonstrate that you cannot administrate a selective system in a fair way, then what you’re doing is illegal,” he says.
Coombs, representing himself, will be up against a barrister for the Information Commissioner’s Office, defending its decision last year [pdf] to uphold the wish of the test-provider, CEM, to withhold the scores, requested by Coombs under Freedom of Information.
Thursday’s hearing is the latest stage of battle that has so far taken four years. “It started with my son getting his [11-plus] results and not doing well,” explains Coombs. “He was distraught. He went to a small primary and he was always the smartest in the class. I wanted to understand what was wrong with this test.”
“Entry [to selective schools] is dependent on cram-feeding children with expensive tutors that not everyone can afford. Tutoring is an insurmountable problem that makes it impossible to operate in a non‑discriminatory and legal way.”
Coombs wants to demonstrate to parents that grammar school admissions depend not on pupils’ ability plotted against a constant, standardised population, but on their ability compared only to children that year, in that area of the country. “If you had the raw marks, you could see that ‘Oh, my child got the same mark as that child last year, but for some reason they’ve not got into that school that they would have got into last year,’” he says.
He also wants to demonstrate that, as he puts it, “precision is not the same as accuracy” when it comes to test scores. Every test has “confidence limits” – a statistical margin for error assigned because no test can be 100% accurate. A 95% confidence interval would be reasonable for this sort of test, but this would mean that pupils scoring the same number of right answers would be separated through a standardisation process.
Do you think there should be more openness and transparency and pupil’s papers should made be available? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin
Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or just someone who cares about education and has something to get off your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.
We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!