The BBC is reporting that the outgoing chief inspector of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw, has called the claim that grammar schools help poorer students as “nonsense” and “tosh”.
The idea that poor children will benefit from a return of grammar schools is “tosh” and “nonsense”, says the outgoing chief inspector of Ofsted. Sir Michael Wilshaw said a return to selection at 11 years old would be a “profoundly retrograde step” that would lead to sliding standards.
Supporters of grammar schools say that children from poor backgrounds are helped to make the most of their potential because entry to such schools is on the basis of raw ability. But many argue that, in fact, the vast majority of those doing well in entrance tests are children whose parents have paid for them to be privately tutored outside school.
In a speech to London Councils’ education conference, Sir Michael praised the success of schools in the capital saying they had undergone an “amazing transformation” and lead the way in “narrowing the attainment gap between rich and poor”. “It has maintained its status as the top performing region across all key stages when it comes to the performance of children eligible for free school meals,” he said.
“If grammar schools are the great answer, why aren’t there more in London?”
Do you think grammar schools are the answer to helping talented students who come from less advantaged families? Let us know in the comments below or via Twitter. ~ Meena
Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or just someone who cares about education and has something to get off your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.
We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!