New Ofsted chief inspector rejected by MPs – read full report

The government’s choice for the new Ofsted chief inspector has been rejected by the Education Select Committee.

The cross-party committee of MPs said it was left with “significant concerns” about Amanda Spielman’s suitability for the post following a recent pre-appointment hearing.

The BBC is reporting that Education Secretary Nicky Morgan has written to the select committee, saying is “surprised and disappointed” and will “now consider the select committee’s report and respond in due course.”

The current chief inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, steps down at the end of this year.

The Education Select Committee published its report this morning and issued an accompanying statement:

The Committee recognises Ms Spielman’s range of experience and acknowledges her contributions to the education sector, principally through her roles at the ARK group of schools and in her current role as Chair of Ofqual. However, after questioning Ms Spielman during the hearing about her background, the challenges facing Ofsted, and her vision if appointed as Chief Inspector, the Committee were left with significant concerns about Ms Spielman’s suitability for the post of HMCI.

Education Committee chair Neil Carmichael MP said:

“Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector has a critical role in raising standards in education, skills and children services and helping to deliver the best possible outcomes for children and young people. The Government’s preferred candidate, Amanda Spielman, has a broad range of experience but failed to demonstrate to us the vision and passion we would expect from a prospective HMCI. The new HMCI will face the task of leading Ofsted to raise standards and improve the lives of children and young people, and we were unconvinced that Ms Spielman would do this effectively.

“Ms Spielman has experience of secondary education but she did not persuade that she had a clear understanding of the other aspects of the Chief Inspector’s role, including early years, primary education, FE, and children’s services. Ms Spielman’s responses on child protection were particularly troubling and did not inspire confidence that she grasped the importance of Ofsted’s inspections in preventing children being held at risk through service failure. As a Committee, we did not leave the session with the view that Amanda Spielman was prepared for the vast scope and complexity of this important role.

“It is unusual for a Select Committee to find itself unable to support the Government’s preferred candidate for a public appointment. However, it is our responsibility to hold Government to account and the seriousness of our concerns regarding this appointment has led us to produce this Report to the House of Commons. There is no urgency in this process – Sir Michael’s term as HMCI does not expire until the end of the year. With this in mind, we call on the Secretary of State not to proceed with Ms Spielman’s appointment.”

As Appendix 4 to the report records, the Secretary of State met two other candidates deemed ‘appointable’ by the recruitment panel before nominating Ms Spielman.

The Committee has also taken the opportunity, notwithstanding their views on the Government’s preferred candidate on this occasion, to express concern about the lack of expertise on children’s services amongst Ofsted’s senior management. The Education Committee believes strong leadership is necessary in this area and recommends a permanent Deputy Chief Inspector be appointed to oversee the inspection of children’s services from the point at which a new Chief Inspector takes up post.

The predecessor Education Committee (in the 2010-15 Parliament) called for Ofsted to be split into an Inspectorate for Education and an Inspectorate for Social Care. Having reflected upon Ms Spielman’s evidence and the evidence which the Committee has taken so far in this Parliament about the role of Ofsted, the Committee agrees that the remit of Ofsted is too large and that placing Ofsted’s social care work into a separate inspectorate would help it to gain a greater profile.

You can read the full report here:

[pdf-embedder url=”https://4cpa373vsw6v3t1suthjdjgv-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/170.pdf”]

Did anyone see this coming? Is it the right decision? And what happens now? Let us know your thoughts in the comments or via Twitter…

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!

 

Spielman 'didn't have the profession's confidence', says teaching union
ATL welcomes pay report - but calls for more
Categories: 1st POST, News and Policy.

Comments

  1. GraemeJordanCV

    SchoolsImprove Vacancy: Head of school inspections. Experience required: None as full training given. Contacts in government an advantage.

  2. wasateacher

    it was seem that Nicky Morgan is ignoring the decision of the Education Select Committee:  https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/535873/160707_Letter_Nicky_Morgan_to_Neil_Carmichael_HMCI_appointment.pdf

Let us know what you think...