Let the market decide university tuition fees

The Telegraph reports that the university tuition fees system is in a mess. The aim was not just to raise money but to create a market in higher education. However, constant state interference has stopped this happening. Now, another Education Secretary, Damian Hinds, is to have a crack at reform but he risks compounding past mistakes.

A review of university finance to be published today, but widely trailed at the weekend, will order universities to slash fees in some courses considered less likely to boost their careers. These might include the arts and social sciences. In addition, institutions will be told to offer more two-year degrees, increase the number of sandwich courses and encourage undergraduates to take the cheaper option of living at home and studying locally.

Some of these ideas are good, not least trying to enhance the popularity of two-year degree courses which are already available but not widely taken up. What we must question is whether the answer to the difficulties confronting the sector and its future students is more government interference.

The political reasoning, of course, is to appeal to younger voters by bringing down the cost of fees and interest charges. But the result will be additional complexity, financial difficulties for universities and another generation of disgruntled graduates burdened with debts that do not reflect the market value of their education.

It might be a better career choice to read an arts subject at Oxford than sciences at a former polytechnic; yet the Government thinks the former should be cheaper. Ideally a different price would apply for every course at every institution. Good universities will charge more, and expand. Good courses at poorer institutions will thrive. Courses that cost more than they benefit will fold, and price will more properly reflect value.

We know from past experience that this judicious mix cannot be achieved by the state but only by the market. Governments should no more fix prices in higher education than in the energy sector. That is a Labour approach, not a Conservative one.

Read more Let the market decide university tuition fees 

Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!



Universities should consider compensation for students hit by strikes, MP says
'No one can deny the holidays are fantastic but without them the physical and mental strain of teaching would be too much'
Categories: Higher Education and University.


  1. Stella

    There is a simple answer. Colleges charge more because they CAN. The way the job market works they have the stamps with the letters “BS”, “MS” engraved and they are taking full advantage of it. The days of thinking “we are doing food” are over for all professions including the formerly respected ones like teaching, medicine etc. Now everyone is in to “how do I make the most money”. The university admin know they have the control and they will keep raising tuition till they exhaust the demand. Programs like cheap federal aid will further this scheme. Remember best way to become rich is to socialize the costs (universities did this through land grant) and privatize the profits ( through high salaries and benefits and facilities). Schemes like federal loans further subsidize this activity.

    The only way this can be stopped is to bring back apprenticeships like in Germany as most jobs don’t need BS and MS. But the thing is US/UK capitalism for companies means they don’t care anymore about investing in employee development.

    So welcome to free markets at work in asymmetric transactions. Education is asymmetric because one can’t get a job which has college degree as requirement even though you know more than a college graduate.

    Stella Ferguson,
    creative writer
    business web page.

Let us know what you think...