I have not been afraid to ask questions on conventional wisdom during my time as chair of the Commons Education Select Committee, whether it be on school funding, exclusions, the value of GCSEs, or value for money in our universities. I am far from being a die-hard traditionalist and have been clear that addressing social injustice in education is my primary ambition. MP Robert Halfon, chair of the Commons Education Select Committee writes in Tes.
But challenging conventional wisdom does not mean revolutionary change for the sake of it, especially when it would mean going backwards rather than forwards.
This is why Jeremy Corbyn’s plan to abolish Sats, while sounding popular in some quarters, is so wrongheaded and would have far-reaching consequences for a generation of youngsters and their teachers.
First, unconscious bias/lack of reliability would be a big problem in alternative teacher assessment models. This is a key point and could seriously undermine disadvantaged children’s prospects.
Second, Sats aren’t a vehicle for selection; they are a tool to measure progress, to hold schools accountable and to get the right support to children who may be falling behind (a position disadvantaged pupils are more likely to be in).
Third, we absolutely must have a benchmark/rigorous way of gauging progress – how else do we know whether what we are doing is working? It is disadvantaged pupils who have the most to lose from their removal, as it is they who gain the most from the targeted support that the Sats data can provide. They also tend to be the ones who are most likely to not be school-ready, and therefore the focus on core competencies that Sats provide is crucial to their development, as well as to ensuring that the next generation have the skills required to become functioning members of society.
The key stage 2 Sats were reformed in 2016 to make them tougher and more focused on the key skills necessary, resulting in (for example) a 9 percentage point rise in the number of pupils meeting the expected standard in reading between 2016 and 2018. Standards are rising because these tests are helping pupils push their boundaries, and making sure that schools get to grips with the key competencies assessed. And that doesn’t mean they are restricting the curriculum to just English and maths; the trend is going the opposite way. Ofsted’s new framework is another clear signal that the inspectorate is looking to reduce pressures on schools, and is encouraging them to ensure they have a broad and balanced curriculum, which can only be a good thing.
Of course, reform is still needed. Sats could do more on recognising progression, as Lord Bew recommended. But the results do help to inform parents and Ofsted, and are important indicators for providing support to both individual pupils and schools as soon as possible.
It may be worth considering more radical proposals, such as introducing comparative judgement for marking writing Sats and other assessments. Championed by the organisation No More Marking, the idea is that teachers or examiners look at two separate answers to subjective questions and simply decide which is better. No red pen or deep marking.
By doing this over and over with different answers, a clear ranking becomes established, and then benchmarks are set to work out where grade boundaries are. Studies suggest that it is even more reliable than the current form of moderation, the feedback provided is no less helpful, and it is definitely less work than going through every piece line by line with corrections.
Read more key points and comments from MP Robert Halfon ‘Jeremy Corbyn’s Sats plan is wrong-headed’
What do you think? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin
Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link
We now have a Facebook page - pls click to like!
More recent posts...