As most people attend only one primary and one secondary school, there can be an assumption that all other schools are broadly similar, run in the same way, and teach much the same content. The fact that, since 1988, England has had a law requiring schools to teach a “National Curriculum” might reinforce that view. John Blake, ex-teacher and now head of education and social reform at Policy Exchange writes in The Yorkshire Post.
Yet this is far from true – and sadly in too many cases children are receiving a poor quality education. Rather than using rigorous textbooks and materials, most teachers are left to develop their own content – this sees many work late into the night and through the weekend, and the result is often not what it should be.
Some schools must teach the National Curriculum, others do not have to, but research I have recently published with the think-tank Policy Exchange shows that even where schools are supposed to be teaching it, the resources they are using are not good enough to ensure children are getting their legal entitlement.
I was delighted that Dame Mary Archer, the chair of the Science Museum Group – which includes the National Railway Museum in York and National Science and Media Museum in Bradford – agreed to write the foreword to my report, urging government to support her own institutions and others in developing “coherent curriculum programmes”, which will include textbooks, lesson resources, assessments and training.
Building new relationships between the subject experts in our museums and learned institutions and the teachers in our schools could enormously improve the learning of our children. But it also has the advantage of reducing workload and pressures on teachers. I taught in state schools for a decade and I have enormous respect for my colleagues, especially those in primary school who teach all the different subjects in the curriculum.
But this creates a punishing workload for them, and some of the places teachers go looking for support actually make the problem worse. We found that teachers often used online resource banks to download free resources, but many of these had no quality assurance mechanisms, and the “pick ’n’ mix” approach this led to meant there was no coherence in the curriculum children were receiving, which in turn made teaching harder.
No textbook or worksheet will ever substitute for a positive relationship between teacher and pupil, but the “oven ready resources” I recommend can underpin those relationships by reducing teacher time spent on activities which can be done effectively by external bodies, harnessing the expertise of the many respected institutions involved with English education beyond schools.
Read the full article How museums can come to teachers’ rescue.
Have you used expert, ready made resources from outside school to lessen your workload? Should textbooks be used more? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin
Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link
We now have a Facebook page - pls click to like!
More recent posts...