‘Men only’ opportunities are rife in education: sexism permeates everything from job ads to old-boys-network consultant roles, writes Andrew Otty in Tes.
I once got a teaching job at an unorthodox meeting in a service station. I’d met the principal informally on another occasion and we’d clicked. He’d asked if I’d read Guy Claxton. I said I had. I hadn’t. I asked him if he had any job opportunities in his school. He said he hadn’t. He seemed like a “great guy” and he clearly thought I was a “great guy”, too. In my blind confidence, in that M5 cafe, I suggested he create a job for me and he did. I suggested what he should pay me and he did.
Later, in post, I found out that it was significantly more than my female manager was being paid. I remember telling myself that I deserved it because I’d had the initiative to negotiate, and that it was a fair representation of my value. Fast forward a few years and I’m waking up to a radio report on sexist behaviour at the Presidents Club charity dinner, and aside from the vile misogyny and exploitative behaviour of the men involved, I’m furious at the exclusive access the event gave its grubby guests to David Meller and Nadhim Zahawi – both senior figures in education and apprenticeships.
I didn’t immediately see the parallel with me and the principal, glancing furtively around in the roadside Costa.
In education, we must resist concentrating power in any exclusive group. The Presidents Club is hopefully an extreme, an outlier in society in general, but the presence of Meller and Zahawi mean we can’t be complacent. We have to examine the practices and habits and behaviours we see, ready to challenge our own “annoying men” whose groping rapaciousness is focused on our finances rather than young hostesses.
The group that I think represents the worst of the sector, and this is with the caveat that there are many noble and excellent exceptions, is consultants. Far too many are confident or arrogant men who didn’t make it in the classroom or in management, and who were rightly managed out to improve the experiences and chances of the children and young people we serve. But unlike in other professions, education seems to remain in thrall to these chancers. Even once they’re purged from a school or college, they find it relatively easy to pick up gigs leeching more money out of our dwindling coffers than they were ever awarded as a salary.
The “Presidents Club” in education are those who can’t even remember being at the chalkface, who aggressively market their vapid teaching philosophies all day while we are actually in classrooms, and who rely on the network of old male chums to throw them a cheque every once in a while. They have their greedy hands on our budgets while we naively auction off our students’ futures
That headteacher, in the M5 Costa Coffee, was a genuinely a good human being. I can’t in clear conscience compare him to the tuxedoed detritus that attended an event where the programme had to advise guests not to sexually harass young women. He certainly wouldn’t have been the type to have clandestine meetings with women in service stations. Which is exactly why my appointment was wrong and sexist; it was a “men only” opportunity. And if we want the rest of society to adopt a better attitude towards women, we had better start by modelling it in education.
Read the full article Education has its own, less conspicuous ‘Presidents Club’
Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin
Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or just someone who cares about education and has something to get off your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.
We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!