Coding the curriculum: new computer science GCSE fails to make the grade

Despite computing education in UK schools going through a massive revolution over the past few years to try and make it more relevant to our increasingly technology driven lives, the new GCSE in computer science has failed to attract much interest from students writes Benjamin Wohl PhD Candidate, Lancaster University in The Conversation.

Figures from the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual) show only a small rise in students taking the new computer science GCSE. This is despite the course having been rebranded and the old GCSE in information and communication technology (ICT) being scrapped.

When the decision to replace the ICT GCSE with only a GCSE in computing was made back in 2015, many teachers and researchers warned this might happen – given that ICT and computer science are very different topics of study.

There were also issues raised about the new course content and the fact that a lot of the focus was placed of coding and programming – something that many students view as irrelevant to them.

My own ongoing research interviewing pupils in year nine about the changes in the way computing and ICT are being taught, has also shown this to be the case. Many of these pupils were frustrated rather than inspired by the shift in the new curriculum

The British Computer Society has equally warned that the number of pupils studying for a computing qualification could halve by 2020 – which would be a disaster for the economy.

Not relevant

Computer skills are already vital to most jobs and this will continue to be the case, but what is still unclear is what sort of computer skills these will be. Education policy seems to give the impression that it is more important to know how to program a computer than how to use one well.

Then there is the issue that what children actually want to know about – things like cyber security and how to get rid of computer viruses – isn’t actually covered in the new style course. So while most children are fully aware that the future world of work will require high level computer skills, they do not see the link between being taught how to program in computer languages and what they will need in the future.

This confusion isn’t their fault, and a lot of it stems from the fact that teachers who previously taught ICT are now being required to teach some combination of computer programming, computer science, computational thinking, and digital literary, with little training or support.

Each of these areas is considered to be important knowledge in terms of the “digital economy”, but what this means is that pupils are receiving a lot of mixed messages on which bits they really need to learn.

In practical terms, this also means computing lessons are now being split between a little bit of time spent looking at concepts of how a computer works, a little bit of time on computational theory – such as search and sort algorithms – and a lot of time learning programming.

Dull and frustrating

Computer programming is hard. Like learning the violin, or a second language, anyone can do it, but for most it takes a significant amount of dedication, time and practice.

The computer science GCSE requires pupils to be proficient programmers to be successful. This has meant teachers now have to spend a great deal of time on programming in the year proceeding GCSE to bring pupils up to speed.

Often this is done through a number of tasks, which are as uninteresting as anything found in the old ICT curriculum. This leaves many pupils with the impression that computer science is programming – and that programming is a dull and frustrating operation of trying to find where you forgot to put a semi colon. As you can imagine, this doesn’t inspire many pupils to want to choose computer science as an option at GCSE.

From the pupil’s point of view, why would anyone who thinks they want to be a mechanic, a doctor or an accountant want to spend any time writing programs in code – it just doesn’t seem relevant to them.

But the thing is that each of these careers is being transformed by the digital economy – as is almost every profession. Only providing a single GCSE option of computer science fails to meet the needs of any student – except those that have at least some interest in becoming a computer scientist.

To only offer computer science is like dropping all the sciences except physics and being surprised when all those who had previous taken biology didn’t just happily go along with it.

Ultimately, if we want to ensure British children have the skills they need to be successful and are not left behind in a digital economy, there needs to a computing curriculum that covers a whole range of areas – not just how to program.

Pupils also need to be spending more than one hour a week – the current standard – learning computing prior to their GCSE years. If this doesn’t change, we are putting the future of the country at risk by disenfranchising many more young people away from computing based careers. And if we want to inspire the next generation of computer scientists, this isn’t the right way to go about it.The Conversation


Read more Coding the curriculum: new computer science GCSE fails to make the grade

What do you think? How are schools going to encourage more pupils to study computing? Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!


Edukit Safeguarding Insight

'Schools can – and should – become curriculum planners again'
What now for grammar schools?
Categories: Exams, Secondary and Teaching.


  1. I agree about what may be called “Digital literacy” skills, those skills that people need to enable them to operate in the digital economy (check out ) The trouble is schools think and work in ‘subjects’ which are a construct and often irrelevant unless you are seeking access to further education. Further the EBacc has had a negative impact on most creative subjects because of its school performance measures being based on core academic subjects (English, mathematics, history or geography, the sciences, a language) and computer science may be no different in this regard. Look back at the Design and Technology curriculum of the 80 and 90’s, that included things like Microelectronics for All (MFA) programme, the Technology Enhancement Programme (TEP), CAD CAM etc and ask why has it disappeared and why is D&T no longer a key subject in the curriculum. In my opinion D&T was the true link between an emerging digital economy and education but we have , and continue, to let it become a minority subject. Being an academic is only one aspect of human intelligence, being creative another and possibly more important in the digital economy.

  2. I know of children who wanted to take it, but the school put them off by saying how difficult it was, and then announced that there were insufficient pupils to warrant running the course. What they really meant was that they didn’t feel up to the job of teaching it, or thought it was far easier to get some top grades for the league table position by ‘encouraging’ the children to take other subjects.

  3. Red

    I agree with Busy Mum – my oldest daughter in year 10 is studying GCSE computer science and she’s worried that she won’t pass it as the teaching is poor! The school threatened to stop the course part way through too! My year 8 daughter has just chosen her options and the school have cut it out of the curriculum altogether! She’s disappointed as she wanted to take it but they now only offer ICT! Also closing 2 local authority technology schools that were in our area hasn’t helped either! Cut backs are a massive part of the problem!

Let us know what you think...