Co-educational schools are bad for girls

Writing in the Guardian, Belinda Parmar says gender-segregated education gives girls the chance to excel without pressures to conform to gender stereotypes…

…Far from being places of equal opportunity and preparation for the real world, even the best co-educational schools do not celebrate girls’ achievements. Worse, girls continually struggle to get their voices heard amongst rowdy cajoling boys. The girls’ school I visited, by comparison, was doing a much better job of overcoming gender stereotypes associated with STEM subjects.

It was a temple to female achievement and had hallways festooned with images of high-achieving women. The school surrounds its girls with photos of female MPs, scientists and entrepreneurs. As a consequence the girls who attend are more likely to see themselves as future leaders.

In an all female environment there’s no reason to assume that subjects have gender: computing and science classes are all full of girls. It’s not unseemly for a girl to imagine herself as a chemist, a primeminister, or possibly both.

The second school I visited was co-educational. As a product of this kind of school myself, I had always believed that the co-ed system was better for girls: sharing classes with the boys is supposed to toughen us up for whatever struggles lie ahead.

Part of this is true – coeducational schools are replete with real world problems – most noticeably the girls feel under the same kind of gender pressure that women do in working life. When girls are amongst boys they feel a greater compulsion to be feminine – often without even realising it.

These stereotypes are impeding girls’ achievements. Girls from single sex schools are almost two and a half times more likely to study physics at A-Level than girls who attend co-ed schools. The number of girls studying computing at A-Level this year decreased again from an already dismally low 297 to 245, just under 6.5% of the total number of students taking the subject.

Co-educational schools show a kind of unintentional systematic bias. They teach a science and history curriculum which mainly emphasises the achievements of remarkable men. There are relatively few female protagonists in text-books – women represent just 27% of all central characters.

This reflects the sad truth that for much of history, women have been relatively powerless and unimportant. It’s hardly surprising that girls leave education with the notion that high achievement is not for them.

One might argue that the girls-only school is teaching a biased version of history by over-emphasising women’s contributions, but the reality is that history has created its own gender-bias.

The last thing a self-conscious 13 year old girl needs is a biased view of the world, we need to celebrate the few female heroes that already exist, and uncover the ones that history has glossed over…

It seems rather ironic that the easiest way to eliminate this gender bias from education is to segregate our children. But that’s just a quick-fix – we need to work much harder to eliminate this kind of bias and celebrate female heroes within our co-educational schools. Girls will only be able to get a fair chance in life when the boys they study alongside see them as equals, and we’re not there yet.

Belinda Parmar is the founder of social enterprise Little Miss Geek which campaigns to celebrate female tech pioneers

More at:  Co-educational schools are bad for girls

What do you think of Belinda Parmar’s argument? Are all-girls schools a better option for girls at the moment? What about single sex classes in co-ed schools – would that make any difference? Please let us know what you think in the comments or on twitter… 

Extra marks for exam illness up 10%
Bedales School's innovative new assessment course shuns GCSEs
Categories: Secondary.

Comments

  1. frankietweetart

    SchoolsImprove but better for boys. Most of our pru girls are from single sex schools. Didn’t work for them.Depends on the individual.

  2. Richardkharker

    SchoolsImprove Occasionally a good practice. In the past when computer labs were rare & had shared machines we ran single sex classes.

  3. Mike Bell

    Again, mostly opinion and little evidence.
    You don’t need single-sex schools to promote the achievement of women.

  4. SquidSingh

    SchoolsImprove Unsure, but often hear: ‘in mixed schools sexes ‘regulate’ each other better’. Girls therefore less assertive automatically?

  5. emerald_politik

    leftferret what exactly do they ‘learn about life’? what boys think of them, What boys want from them… I’d rather they aced exams #edchat

  6. emerald_politik

    SchoolsImprove leftferret There’s a time & place for everything. Let girls grow up independent of stereotypes before they explore rest.

  7. thesunsetgirl

    emerald_politik Thanks for following! I agree with you. Also, I think it’s more important for girls to know themselves. Have a great day!

Let us know what you think...