Call to end limit on religious free schools

The BBC is reporting that the New Schools Network is calling for the removal of the rules for free schools limiting the number of places allocated on grounds of religion.

Under the current free school regulations, if a faith group opened a free school it could only give priority to applicants on the grounds of religion for half the places.

This has been seen as a deterrent to faith groups who might want to apply to open free schools, with fewer than a fifth of free schools currently having a link to a religious group, lower than the state sector average.

The New Schools Network, part-funded by the Department for Education, says that these limited number of faith free schools are the most oversubscribed in the primary school sector.

The government has a target to open 500 more free schools – and all new schools opened by academy trusts now have to be designated as free schools.

But the New Schools Network, a key supporter of the government’s free school expansion, says there is “significant untapped potential” among current school providers.

In particular, it highlights Catholic schools, saying “over 85% of children in Catholic state schools are in good or outstanding schools, compared to 80% in all schools”.

Catholic schools also have a higher proportion of ethnic minority pupils than average, says the New Schools Network.

The charity says it wants to abolish the cap on places for faith free schools, which has proved a disincentive.

This would apply to any faith groups wanting to open free schools, says the New Schools Network.

It also says there could be “multi-religious” schools, proposed by partnerships of different faiths.

Mr Timothy said: “Although well-intentioned, the current 50% cap on admissions is actually blocking existing high-calibre school providers creating the much-needed places that parents want…”

Paul Barber, director of the Catholic Education Service, said Catholic schools remained “open to the idea” of free schools, but the current limits meant they were “unable to engage”.

He said that it was against “common sense” for a faith group to open a school and then once its 50% quota had been reached to turn parents away because they belonged to that faith group…

A statement from the Department for Education said: “The requirement for all oversubscribed faith free schools to make at least 50% of their places available to those of another or no faith helps to tackle segregation and ensures young people will experience the diversity of religious beliefs that make up modern Britain.”

More at: Call to end limit on religious free schools

 

See also: Time to end the special favours shown to faith schools

 

The New Schools Network is pointing out a dilemma here: we need more schools (or at least more school places) yet religious groups such as the Catholic church, currently running many successful and over-subscribed schools, are not prepared to create new ones because of the 50% cap.

Would it make sense to get rid of this restriction, at least while we have a places issue?

Please let us know why/why not in the comments or via Twitter…

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!

 

Today's poll: Is there too much emphasis on A-levels post-16?
Ofsted can downgrade schools for Islamic veils
Categories: Academies, Free Schools and Policy.

Comments

  1. The NSN is being disingenuous when it says that faith parents are turned away if the free school is oversubscribed.  This only happens if the 50% non-faith quota is filled.  If there are insufficient applications for non-faith places then these can be filled with faith applicants.

  2. Christine Blower, cited by the BBC, is right.  State schools are taxpayer funded and should not erect barriers which discriminate against children of fellow taxpayers.  It’s disappointing that many Christian VA schools don’t follow the words of their leader: ‘Suffer little children to come unto me and forbid them not’.  This criticism doesn’t apply to CoE VC schools (the ones under so-called LA ‘control’) because they adhere to LA-wide admission criteria.  It could be said that CoE VC schools are the only faith ones which don’t discriminate.

  3. Nairb1

    The NSN is a political lobby group funded by the government. The failing free school project requires significant rule changes to keep it afloat artificially … and of course given the current government policy of better integration nothing could be more appropriate than more and more religiously segregated schools!

  4. The NSN is also suggesting a new category for opening free schools – on the grounds of ‘social’ need.  This apparently would allow free schools to open in areas where schools appear to be segregated.  
    This seems rather at odds with their other suggestion that the requirement ensuring faith free schools can only prioritise 50% of their places on grounds of faith be scrapped.
    The answer to segregated schools is to require schools not to discriminate on grounds of faith.  This would be more effective than opening schools in areas where there is no need for extra places.
    See Schools Week for details: http://schoolsweek.co.uk/government-urged-to-open-free-schools-in-segregated-communities/

  5. Nairb1 See my comment above about NSN’s suggestion that free schools should be allowed if there’s a ‘social’ need.  Talk about grasping at straws.

  6. JudithBosavern

    SchoolsImprove Because they aren’t interested in diversity and serving local communities? Why should we pay for segregation?

  7. TW

    “fewer than a fifth of free schools currently having a link to a religious group”

    Presumably because people with genuine religious convictions are already catered for.

    “The New Schools Network, part-funded by the Department for Education”

    Exactly what percentage of NSN’s funding is not derived from the Conservative Government giving them taxpayer money?

    “all new schools opened by academy trusts now have to be designated as free schools”

    Even though free schools are actually academy schools.  More corroboration that the government’s policies are essentially based on deception.

    “it highlights Catholic schools, saying “over 85% of children in Catholic state schools are in good or outstanding schools, compared to 80% in all schools””

    Only that? When selection by religion is a ruse for selection by ability?

    “there could be “multi-religious” schools, proposed by partnerships of different faiths”

    And partnerships of liars and hypocrites pretending to be religious.

Let us know what you think...