Axing parent governors is opposite of Cameron’s ‘parent power’

Writing in his column in the Guardian, Warwick Mansell says outside sponsors will replace parent power when school become academies, but no parent got to vote on the decision.

Do “the parents, the governors and the headteacher” really end up “in full control” of schools when they become academies, as David Cameron told parliament during prime minister’s questions last week? The claim was made in response to a question by Caroline Lucas, the Green party’s MP, asking why residents near her Brighton constituency, who had rejected the academisation of Hove Park school, would see their views count for nothing with all schools now forced to become academies.

The very next day the latest white paper on education was published, which included a promise that academies would no longer have to have any parent governors. This would be the culmination of years of policymakers, perhaps led by the private equity tycoon who is now in control of state-funded schools as academies minister, Lord Nash, saying English school boards should be more businesslike.

The government consistently blocked Labour moves, during the recent parliamentary passage of the Education and Adoption Act, to ensure parents were consulted in cases where schools were facing academisation.

The white paper also favours multi-academy trusts: academy chains whose governance rules allow conventional school governors to have little or no power, with an outside sponsor able to appoint all decision-makers.

No parent got to vote on this plan as a whole, as it wasn’t in the Tory manifesto. This seems a strange form of parental and governor control…

More (including interesting insights into spending on educational consultants) at Axing parent governors in schools is the opposite of Cameron’s ‘parent power’

 

Your thoughts on Warwick Mansell’s take on the impact for school democracy of the latest government policy initiatives?

Please let us know in the comments or via Twitter…

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!

 

Sir Ken Robinson urges schools to increase outdoor playtime for children
Can the BBC Micro Bit inspire a million to engage with technology?
Categories: Academies, Parenting and Policy.

Comments

  1. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove This “every school an academy” is the clearest “we don’t trust the public to make ‘right’ decisions” message yet from govt

  2. andylutwyche

    SchoolsImprove This move to remove parent governors isolates schools from local community which can only be damaging in my view

  3. TW

    MATs can also remove all governors from their individual schools and have only the MAT board itself, potentially filled only with private equity wannabes.

  4. TW

    MATs can also remove all governors from their individual schools and have only the MAT board itself, potentially filled only with private equity wannabes.

  5. TW

    MATs can also remove all governors from their individual schools and have only the MAT board itself, potentially filled only with private equity wannabes.

  6. SDPenny1

    peterbellswfc ‘They’ haven’t, of course, axed parent governors, but rather made elected parents governors not mandatory

  7. peterbellswfc

    SDPenny1 ‘They’ have, of course, axed the category of Parent Governor, meaning parents no longer have a say over who is elected to the GB.

  8. peterbellswfc

    SDPenny1 no, but it now makes it increasingly difficult for ‘new’ parents to have a role in governing an academy, unless selected by the GB

  9. peterbellswfc

    SDPenny1 no, but it now makes it increasingly difficult for ‘new’ parents to have a role in governing an academy, unless selected by the GB

  10. On 16 March, shortly before the Budget, the PM said, ‘I would argue that academy schools represent true devolution, because the parents, the governors and the headteacher end up having full control of the school and are able to make decisions about its future.’
    But lurking in the background was a White Paper already printed saying governing bodies would no longer require parent governors.  He either didn’t know it was there (very unlikely) or he lied.
    And governing bodies in multi-academy trusts don’t make decisions – that’s done at Trust level.

  11. nashussein

    camphillboiler SchoolsImprove leoniedelt ZafarMBE Parents as partners and co-educators provides a successful educational landscape.

Let us know what you think...