‘At our parent-led free school, we didn’t enter any Year 11s for GCSEs – it was in their best interests’

Tes reports that Route 39 Academy in Devon was placed in special measures by Ofsted in July last year, after it emerged that the school had decided not to enter any Year 11 pupils for GCSEs. 

Last month, the school’s governors resigned, claiming that they’d been bullied by Ofsted. Below, one of the former governors, Ann Ward, offers her point of view.

We started out in 2012 as the darlings of then education secretary Michael Gove’s revolutionary ambitions, as well as prime minister David Cameron’s “Big Society” of parent-led, grassroots community volunteers who put lives on hold to challenge the status quo. However, nobody in Westminster had considered how this would work in practice.

We have spent five years squeezed into temporary cabins, with intermittent phone and internet, exposed to the mud and gales in a remote area of North Devon that a few people visit on holiday and no one really cares about. In an atmosphere of community warfare, we struggled to recruit and form partnerships. We became a refuge for desperate and disenfranchised students.

These students added to our mountain of challenges, but also became our biggest source of pride. Our vision centred on prioritising relationships to develop confidence. Our parent surveys showed that this was being achieved. Slowly, by the sheer hard slog of a committed team, the school was settling into its systems and taking shape. The certainty of a permanent home was on the horizon and we saw progress.

Then we made a fatal error: we went rogue. We delayed the GCSEs of 11 students to improve their chances. We considered this to be the essence of the free school policy: being empowered to make decisions in our students’ interests. But, of course, that was never Gove’s intention. He used free schools to break up the existing power bases. He then imposed from the centre a far more prescriptive, backward-looking curriculum and then established academy chains to gobble up the spoils.

“Free” has nothing to do with this policy. Innovators and independent thinkers are definitely not welcome. Ultimately, the costs of the policy have added to the austerity burden that is affecting British politics so profoundly.

Read the full article ‘At our parent-led free school, we didn’t enter any Year 11s for GCSEs – it was in their best interests’

Please tell us your thoughts in comments or via Twitter ~ Tamsin

Are you a trainee teacher, NQT, teacher, headteacher, parent or  just someone who cares about education and has something to get off  your chest in a Schools Improvement Guest Post? Follow this link for more details at the bottom of the page.

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link.

We now have a Facebook page - please click to like!


Society asks more of schools than it did a generation ago, Education Secretary says
Why are SATs results taken as a greater measure of progress than emotional and social development?
Categories: Exams and Free Schools.


  1. It took her how long to understand this? She presumably being someone who decided she knew better than people who had actually been trained and selected to know what they were doing. Should she be given an award for perception?

  2. Anonymous

    I feel sorry for the students who weren’t entered for their GCSEs in year 11. Reading between the lines they didn’t get a good enough education, otherwise they would have been entered? I agree with the previous comment, these people took the risk that it may not work out, everyone knew at the time it was all about dogma. These people risked the education of that cohort of children, and it is those children who will suffer because some middle class do gooders fancied a new hobby. These free schools got all the funding and the rest of the state sector suffered because of it.

Let us know what you think...