Are ‘biased political statements’ in Ace schools’ curriculum incompatible with new standards?

The Guardian has an investigation into the Accelerated Christian Education (Ace) group of fundamentalist Christian schools and asks if the nature of the education they provide fails to meet impartiality standards. Here’s an extract from the Guardian…

Ace schools are unlike any others. Students work at desks facing the wall, with partitions separating them from their neighbours. They complete a series of workbooks (Paces); interaction with others is forbidden during this time.

Paces integrate religious instruction seamlessly. Scripture memorisation is compulsory. Science emphasises young Earth creationism; history is presented as “His-story”. In maths, students calculate the dimensions of Noah’s ark. In English, they underline verbs in sentences such as:

God will bless obedience and humility.

I shall obey Thy statutes and judgments.

Humility pleases the Lord Jesus Christ.

After completing these exercises, students proceed to mark their own work from answer keys. This is possible because in Ace, questions have one correct answer.

Last year, the government’s Independent School Standards were amended. The standard applied to political questions is now met if “political issues are brought to the attention of pupils [and] they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views”.

A school cannot do this and use the Ace curriculum. Biased political statements are not only part of Paces, they are also built into assessments that are integral to the curriculum.

In an English test, students face the following multiple-choice question:

(29) Responsible citizens will vote for political candidates who

a. promise to provide good paying jobs for all those who are out of work

b. promise to cut back on both government services and spending and cut taxes

c. promise to raise taxes on “big business” and use the money to help the poor

d. promise to provide child-care services for all mothers who need to work

(The “correct” answer is b.)

Ace’s political views find their way into science, too, with a biology unit stating the objective: “When you have successfully completed this Pace, you should be able … to tell why abortion is wrong”. In history, students learn:

“Since its inception in 1948, the modern state of Israel has had to defend itself against its Arab neighbours many times. Over and over again, some Arab leader would raise the cry of ‘holy war’ to drive the Jews into the sea; however, the hand of God is on his chosen people even to this day.
“The fantastic victory of Israel in the Six-Day War proved [its critics] wrong. Can we doubt that God had His hand in the outcome of this war?”

After giving more examples and explaining how difficult it would be for an Ofsted inspector to know where to look to find potentially controversial material, the article concludes…

This cannot be addressed by an Ofsted inspection. The Ace curriculum is rigidly standardised and has operated largely unchanged for decades. If the Ace curriculum does not meet the required standards, ensuring that would amount to demanding that much of it is rewritten. It may be that the options are either to change the standards, or to close the schools.

More at: Are fundamentalist schools up to standard?

Forensic science: how to turn your classroom into a CSI lab
Scottish teachers 'support' strike action over pensions
Categories: Secondary.

Let us know what you think...