How anti-racist campaigners re-racialised schools

Spiked reports that for years, government officials and assorted experts have emphasised the problem of racism in education. Even as British society has become palpably less racist, more and more policy, advice and guidance has descended on schools.

There has been much focus on both the spectre of racist playground incidents and the low attainment of black pupils. And, in recent years, such official interference has actually worked to re-instate racial thinking.

Last week, the Runnymede Trust – a key player in the rise of official anti-racism – and the National Union of Teachers (NUT) published a report claiming to reveal ‘the impact of racism on BME teachers’. The report focuses on black and Asian NUT members, nine per cent of whom (1,027) responded to a questionnaire. Fifteen of them then attended three focus groups. According to the report’s findings, black and Asian teachers are being given ‘stereotypical tasks’ to do, like running Black History Month events or ‘challenging behaviour’ classes.

But over the past few decades groups like Runnymede have tried to turn back the clock. In the name of tackling inequality, anti-racist groups have championed the training up of more black teachers, purely because they were deemed more capable of working with and inspiring black students. This has fostered a climate in which teachers, and their responsibilities, have begun to be divided along racial lines.

That black and Asian teachers are being pigeonholed is concerning. But this is the result not of racism, but official anti-racism – by education policy driven by identity politics.

Read more How anti-racist campaigners re-racialised schools

Are black and Asian teachers being pigeonholed and given ‘stereotypical tasks’ to do in your school? Please tell us your thoughts in the comments or on Twitter ~ Tamsin

Don’t forget you can sign up to receive our daily email bulletin (around 7am) with all the latest schools news stories. Your details will never be given to anyone else and you can unsubscribe at any stage. Just follow this link 

We now have a Facebook page - pls click to like!


More recent posts...


Attainment: Closing the gender gap
Roy Blatchford: 'Does recruitment need to be like this?'
Categories: Employment, Primary, Secondary, and Teaching.


  1. Couldn’t agree more. Typical left-wing ploy is to invent a problem in order to impose an agenda. Grew up in London, we all played perfectly happily together. Nobody thought about each other’s skin colour until the anti-racists started telling us all not to be racist.

    • wasateacher

      Busy Mum: that may have been your experience but that was not what was happening across the country. In the ’70s one of the local employment agencies was told by one of the local business not to send them any black people to interview. That was just one example – there were many, many more just in Wandsworth. This pattern was replicated across the country. People were (and still are) refused accommodation because of their ethnicity. In the early 1980s 2 teachers in the Maths department of the school I worked in were blatantly racist and sexist. Back then there were community relations offices and a community relations commission and it was only in 1968 that discrimination was made illegal. Now those organisations don’t exist. You might think “that was 50 years ago things have changed” but the racism is just far more subtle. How else do we have political parties like UKIP and BNP?

Let us know what you think...